Serie AOctober 28, 20263 min readBy Peter OlaleruEditor & Founder

Venezia 0-0 Inter at the break: Inter's control meets a 3-5-2 wall

Half-time at the Penzo: Venezia 0-0 Inter. Inter have 65% possession and 1.29 first-half xG, but Venezia's 3-5-2 block holds. Full first-half stats and analysis

Updated October 28, 2026

TweetLinkedIn
Report an issue
Venezia vs Inter
Serie A
October 28, 2026
HALF TIME
0-0
Stadio Pier Luigi Penzo

Venezia and Inter go into the half-time break level at 0-0 at the Stadio Pier Luigi Penzo. Inter have had the ball for 65% of the first half and have spent long spells camped in Venezia's defensive third, but the home side's 3-5-2 block has kept the game scoreless.

Both teams lined up in a 3-5-2. For Venezia, that means three centre-backs, five across midfield and two forwards, a shape designed to keep the middle congested and force Inter wide. Inter's identical shape gives them three centre-backs to build with and five midfielders to circulate the ball, but it also means the two forwards are often isolated against a back three when the ball goes long.

The first-half numbers tell the story of control without a breakthrough. Inter had 65% possession, completed 293 passes at 90% accuracy and made 211 passes in Venezia's half. Venezia, by contrast, completed 143 passes at 84% and made 88 passes in Inter's half. Inter also had 25 touches in the box to Venezia's 10.

The xG picture

Inter's first-half expected goals came to 1.29, all of it from open play. Venezia's came to 0.84, with 0.81 from open play and 0.04 from set pieces. Inter managed six shots to Venezia's eight, but only one on target to Venezia's three. Inter created two big chances; Venezia created one.

The shot count is the anomaly. Venezia have had more attempts, and more of them have been on target, but Inter's chances have been of higher quality. That is reflected in the xG split: Inter's 1.29 from six shots is a higher average per shot than Venezia's 0.84 from eight.

Where the space closed

Venezia's 3-5-2 has squeezed the central lanes, and five Inter players have felt it. Andy Diouf was dispossessed once, completed 86.8% of his passes and had 47 touches. Aleksandar Stanković was not dispossessed, passed at 92.1% and had 46 touches. Alessandro Bastoni, on the other hand, saw plenty of the ball — 87 touches, 92.2% passing accuracy — and carries a 7.55 rating, the highest of the five. Yann Aurel Bisseck had 50 touches at 86.5% passing and a 7.01 rating. Marcus Thuram was the most disrupted: dispossessed twice, 76.9% passing accuracy, just 28 touches and a 6.69 rating.

Thuram's low touch count is the clearest sign of Venezia's block working. Inter's front two have been unable to pin the Venezia back three, and the service into them has been contested. Bonny's first-half xG of 0.99 shows he has still found the positions, but the final connection has not come.

Inter's set-piece threat has been almost non-existent: 0.00 first-half xG from set plays, against Venezia's 0.04. For a side with 65% of the ball and five first-half corners to Venezia's one, that is a notable gap. Inter's corners have come to nothing, and Venezia's back three have dealt with the deliveries.

What the half-time scoreline means

A 0-0 at the break at the Penzo is not the scoreline Inter's first-half control deserved on territory alone, but it is the scoreline their finishing and Venezia's block have produced. Inter have had the ball, the passes and the box touches. Venezia have had the better shot accuracy and the more resilient shape.

The second half will ask whether Inter can turn 65% possession and 1.29 xG into a goal, or whether Venezia's 3-5-2 can keep the game level and punish Inter on the break. Venezia have already shown they can get shots away — eight in the first half — and Inter's back three will need to stay alert against the two Venezia forwards.

Sources

  1. [1]FotMob
  2. [2]Photo: kallerna / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0, cropped
Peter Olaleru

Editor & Founder

Peter Olaleru

Peter is the founder and editor of Measured Take and a cybersecurity professional. He leads our news, fact checks, sport and guides from around the world, with a particular eye on cyber attacks, data breaches, scams, AI and misinformation.

TweetLinkedIn

Reader notes

Loading comments...