Serie AOctober 28, 20263 min readBy Peter OlaleruEditor & Founder

Cissè Double Flips San Siro Script as Milan Lead Bologna 2-1 at the Break

Alphadjo Cissè scored twice in 13 minutes as Milan lead Bologna 2-1 at half-time. Mbangula opened the scoring for the visitors at San Siro.

Updated October 28, 2026

TweetLinkedIn
Report an issue
Milan vs Bologna
Serie A
October 28, 2026
HALF TIME
2-3
A crowded football stadium at night with many spectators — Milan Return to San Siro With Bologna in Sight and Pulisic Absent

Cissè Turns the Half on Its Head

Milan lead Bologna 2-1 at half-time at the Stadio Giuseppe Meazza, and the scoreline carries the fingerprints of one player. Alphadjo Cissè has two goals from 1.33 expected goals, turning an early deficit into a lead inside 27 minutes.

Bologna struck first. Samuel Mbangula finished with his right foot in the 8th minute from a Nadir Zortea assist, a chance worth 0.53 xG. It was the away side's clearest moment of the half and, for a spell, the game's only moment of consequence.

Milan's response was measured rather than frantic. Cissè equalised in the 14th minute, right foot, no assist, from a chance rated 0.47 xG. Thirteen minutes later he had his second, this time left foot, from 0.86 xG, with Fikayo Tomori providing the assist. Two shots, two goals, 1.33 xG — the individual numbers belong to him.

Match stats at half-time

Milan created the better chances: 1.40 xG to 0.57.

MilanBologna
PossessionMilan · Possession: 68%Bologna · Possession: 32%68%32%xGMilan · xG: 1.40Bologna · xG: 0.571.400.57ShotsMilan · Shots: 5Bologna · Shots: 353On targetMilan · On target: 2Bologna · On target: 222Big chancesMilan · Big chances: 2Bologna · Big chances: 121Box touchesMilan · Box touches: 9Bologna · Box touches: 797CornersMilan · Corners: 1Bologna · Corners: 111
Source: FotMob

Milan's Control, Bologna's Efficiency

The half-time possession split reads 68-32 in Milan's favour. Milan completed 316 passes at 90% accuracy; Bologna completed 131 at 80%. Milan played 80 passes in the opposition half to Bologna's 41. The shape notes list Milan in a 4-2-3-1 and Bologna in a 3-4-2-1, and the territory reflects that: Milan's midfield pair has had the ball, Bologna's back three has had to defend the box.

But the chance creation is closer than the possession suggests. Milan's 1.40 xG came almost entirely from open play — 1.37 — with just 0.02 from set plays. Bologna's 0.57 xG was all open play. Milan took five shots to Bologna's three, but both sides put two on target. Bologna's three shots produced 0.57 xG; Milan needed five to produce 1.40. The difference is finishing quality, not chance volume.

Shots by player

Alphadjo Cissè and Samuel Mbangula had the most shots, 2 each.

Figures in shots

MilanBologna
012Alphadjo CissèAlphadjo CissèAlphadjo Cissè: 22Samuel MbangulaSamuel MbangulaSamuel Mbangula: 22Ardon JashariArdon JashariArdon Jashari: 11Fikayo TomoriFikayo TomoriFikayo Tomori: 11Pervis EstupinánPervis EstupinánPervis Estupinán: 11Tommaso PobegaTommaso PobegaTommaso Pobega: 11
Source: FotMob

The Decisive Detail

Milan's two big chances to Bologna's one is the half's most telling number. Cissè converted both of his. Mbangula converted his. The goalkeepers have been beaten three times between them, and the xG ledger — 1.40 to 0.57 — sits alongside the score rather than rewriting it.

Bologna won 26 duels to Milan's 22, and committed four fouls to Milan's seven. No yellow cards were shown. Jens Odgaard and Zortea have been involved for Bologna without registering a goal contribution; Tomori's assist is the only Milan contribution outside Cissè's two finishes.

The second half asks a simple question: can Bologna turn territorial disadvantage into another clear chance, or does Cissè's 13-minute burst decide it?

Sources

  1. [1]FotMob
  2. [2]Goal
  3. [3]Photo: Unsplash
Peter Olaleru

Editor & Founder

Peter Olaleru

Peter is the founder and editor of Measured Take and a cybersecurity professional. He leads our news, fact checks, sport and guides from around the world, with a particular eye on cyber attacks, data breaches, scams, AI and misinformation.

TweetLinkedIn

Reader notes

Loading comments...