Premier LeagueOctober 11, 20263 min readBy Peter OlaleruEditor & Founder

Liverpool 0-0 Manchester City at Half-Time: Anfield Stalemate Built on Set-Piece Threat, Not Open Play

Half-time at Anfield: Liverpool 0-0 Manchester City. Hosts' 0.42 xG is set-piece driven; City dominate possession but create just 0.07 xG from open play.

Updated October 11, 2026

TweetLinkedIn
Report an issue
Liverpool vs Manchester City
Premier League
October 11, 2026
HALF TIME
0-0
Liverpool vs Manchester City: Tactical Questions Loom Before Anfield Clash

Half-Time at Anfield: Level, But Not Without Shape

Liverpool and Manchester City go into the break at 0-0 at Anfield, a scoreline that flatters neither side's attacking intent but accurately reflects a first half short on clear chances. The hosts have edged the shot count 5-3 and put 2 on target to City's 1, but the expected goals map tells the real story: Liverpool's 0.42 xG is almost entirely built from set plays, while City's 0.07 xG is the lowest open-play return you will see from a Pep Guardiola side in a half of football.

Set-Piece Threat Carries Liverpool, Open Play Carries Nothing

The breakdown is stark. Liverpool's 0.33 xG from set plays accounts for 79% of their total first-half output. From open play, they have generated just 0.09 xG — a figure that underlines how little they have created against a City back line that has held its shape without ever looking truly stretched. Jérémy Jacquet's 0.24 xG is the single largest individual contribution to that set-piece total, a reminder that Liverpool's most dangerous moments have come from dead balls rather than sustained possession.

City, meanwhile, have had 54% of the ball and completed 198 passes at 85% accuracy, 95 of them in Liverpool's half. They have touched the ball in the box 6 times to Liverpool's 10, but the quality of those entries has been poor. Zero big chances for either side. Zero goals. The game has been played in front of defences rather than through them.

Shots by player

Víctor Muñoz had the most shots, 2.

Figures in shots

LiverpoolManchester City
012Víctor MuñozVíctor MuñozVíctor Muñoz: 22Alexis Mac AllisterAlexis Mac AllisterAlexis Mac Allister: 11Antoine SemenyoAntoine SemenyoAntoine Semenyo: 11Enzo FernándezEnzo FernándezEnzo Fernández: 11Florian WirtzFlorian WirtzFlorian Wirtz: 11Jérémy JacquetJérémy JacquetJérémy Jacquet: 11
Source: FotMob

Match stats at half-time

Liverpool created the better chances: 0.42 xG to 0.07.

LiverpoolManchester City
PossessionLiverpool · Possession: 46%Manchester City · Possession: 54%46%54%xGLiverpool · xG: 0.42Manchester City · xG: 0.070.420.07ShotsLiverpool · Shots: 5Manchester City · Shots: 353On targetLiverpool · On target: 2Manchester City · On target: 121Big chancesLiverpool · Big chances: 0Manchester City · Big chances: 000Box touchesLiverpool · Box touches: 10Manchester City · Box touches: 6106CornersLiverpool · Corners: 4Manchester City · Corners: 242
Source: FotMob

The Midfield Battle and What It Means for the Second Half

Ryan Gravenberch has been central to Liverpool's resistance, and the duel count — 27-25 in Liverpool's favour — shows a home side willing to compete physically rather than sit deep. Ten fouls from Liverpool to City's eight, and one yellow card to the hosts, indicate a first half that has been scrappy in the middle third. City's 4-1-4-1 has kept the ball but not the penetration; Liverpool's 4-2-3-1 has conceded territory but not chances.

The question for the second half is whether City can turn possession into open-play xG, and whether Liverpool's set-piece threat can produce the game's first clear chance. On this evidence, the dead ball remains the most likely source of a goal.

Sources

  1. [1]FotMob
  2. [2]Photo: Unsplash
Peter Olaleru

Editor & Founder

Peter Olaleru

Peter is the founder of Measured Take and a cybersecurity professional. He covers breaches, vulnerabilities, threat intelligence, APTs, and compliance. His reporting draws on hands-on experience in the security industry to make complex threats understandable.

TweetLinkedIn

Reader notes

Loading comments...