La LigaOctober 21, 20264 min readBy Peter OlaleruEditor & Founder

Brugué's Two-Minute Blitz Lifts Levante Past Athletic Club

Roger Brugué scored twice in two minutes as Levante beat Athletic Club 3-1 in LaLiga, converting 38% possession into three goals at the Ciutat de València.

Updated October 21, 2026

TweetLinkedIn
Report an issue
Levante vs Athletic Club
La Liga
October 21, 2026
FULL TIME
3-1
Estadio Ciudad de Valencia

Roger Brugué scored twice in the space of two first-half minutes and Levante converted a 38% share of the ball into a 3–1 win over Athletic Club at the Estadio Ciudad de Valencia. The home side scored three goals from 12 shots, seven of them on target, against an Athletic team that took 21 shots and finished the night with nothing to show for the territory it controlled.

Brugué opened the scoring on 20 minutes, finishing left-footed from Dani Requena's assist, a chance worth 0.20 xG. Two minutes later he struck again, this time right-footed, from a move that carried 0.51 xG — the clearest opening of the match. Two shots, two goals, and Levante had the cushion that shaped everything that followed.

Roger Brugué v Alex Berenguer

Alex Berenguer led on touches: 70 to 26.

Roger BruguéAlex Berenguer
TouchesRoger Brugué · Touches: 26Alex Berenguer · Touches: 702670Chances createdRoger Brugué · Chances created: 0Alex Berenguer · Chances created: 000ShotsRoger Brugué · Shots: 2Alex Berenguer · Shots: 525xGRoger Brugué · xG: 0.71Alex Berenguer · xG: 0.950.710.95RatingRoger Brugué · Rating: 8.80Alex Berenguer · Rating: 8.278.808.27
Source: FotMob

Athletic's Possession Without Penetration

Athletic Club lined up in a 4-2-3-1 and Levante in a 4-4-2, and the shape of the contest was set early. The visitors finished with 62% possession, 458 accurate passes at 85%, and 245 passes in the opposition half to Levante's 90. They won 49 duels to Levante's 38 and took nine corners to three. By almost every volume measure, they were the busier team.

The problem was where that volume landed. Athletic's 21 shots produced 1.90 xG, but only 0.76 of it came from open play — the bulk of their threat was manufactured from set pieces, where they generated 0.34 xG. Levante, by contrast, built 1.92 of their 1.98 xG in open play. The home side's 12 shots were fewer but sharper: seven on target against Athletic's four, and three big chances against one.

Expected goals (xG) by half

Athletic Club's xG went from 0.66 in the first half to 1.23 in the second.

Figures in xG

First halfSecond half
0.811.2LevanteLevanteLevante · First half: 0.89Levante · Second half: 1.080.89 → 1.08Athletic ClubAthletic ClubAthletic Club · First half: 0.66Athletic Club · Second half: 1.230.66 → 1.23
Source: FotMob

Alex Berenguer carried Athletic's attack, finishing with a goal and 0.95 xG of his own. He converted from the penalty spot on 67 minutes to pull one back, and his individual output was the one consistent counterweight to Levante's efficiency. Hugo Rincón added 0.08 xG, while Thiago Fernández contributed 0.09 — useful contributions, but not enough to convert Athletic's control into a second goal.

The Second Half and the Closing Detail

Athletic pushed harder after the break, taking 63% of second-half possession and generating 1.23 xG to Levante's 1.08. They out-shot the home side 8–5 in the period and won 27 duels to 17. Berenguer's penalty on 67 minutes gave them a route back into the match, and for a stretch the game looked like it might turn.

Levante absorbed it. Their second-half passing dropped to 69% accuracy, but they kept their shape, defended the box — 16 touches in their own area against Athletic's 16 — and held the visitors to a single shot on target after the interval. The substitutions did not swing the match; they reinforced it. Levante's bench protected the lead rather than chasing the game, and Athletic's changes could not manufacture the clear chance their possession deserved.

The decisive detail arrived deep into stoppage time. K. Etta Eyong scored Levante's third on 90+8', turning a one-goal margin into a 3–1 scoreline that flattered the home side's control but accurately reflected their finishing. Athletic had 21 shots and 1.90 xG; Levante had 12 shots and 1.98 xG. The difference was not the volume of chances but which team took them.

Match stats

Levante created the better chances: 1.98 xG to 1.90.

LevanteAthletic Club
PossessionLevante · Possession: 38%Athletic Club · Possession: 62%38%62%xGLevante · xG: 1.98Athletic Club · xG: 1.901.981.90ShotsLevante · Shots: 12Athletic Club · Shots: 211221On targetLevante · On target: 7Athletic Club · On target: 474Big chancesLevante · Big chances: 3Athletic Club · Big chances: 131Box touchesLevante · Box touches: 30Athletic Club · Box touches: 293029CornersLevante · Corners: 3Athletic Club · Corners: 939
Source: FotMob

What the Result Means

Levante move to 11th in LaLiga on the back of a performance that will not be remembered for its fluency. They had 38% of the ball, completed 254 passes at 77%, and spent long stretches without it. What they had was Brugué, whose two goals in two minutes — from 0.71 xG across the match — gave them a lead they never surrendered, and a clinical edge that Athletic could not match.

Athletic Club sit 13th after a night that exposed the gap between control and conversion. Berenguer's penalty and his 0.95 xG were the bright spots, but a team that takes 21 shots and scores once from open play will look back at this one with frustration. The shape was right, the territory was theirs, and the result went the other way.

For Levante, the win is a template: defend the box, take the chances when they come, and let the opponent have the ball in areas that do not hurt. For Athletic, it is a reminder that possession without penetration is just a number.

Sources

  1. [1]FotMob
  2. [2]Photo: Francesc Fort / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0, cropped
Peter Olaleru

Editor & Founder

Peter Olaleru

Peter is the founder and editor of Measured Take and a cybersecurity professional. He leads our news, fact checks, sport and guides from around the world, with a particular eye on cyber attacks, data breaches, scams, AI and misinformation.

TweetLinkedIn

Reader notes

Loading comments...