Serie ANovember 8, 20263 min readBy Peter OlaleruEditor

Juventus's 2-2 Draw at Fiorentina Exposes Gap Between Process and Points

Juventus dominated territory and final-third passing but needed a Bremer header to salvage a point, leaving them well short of the pace set by Massimo Carrera's

TweetLinkedIn
Report an issue
Fiorentina vs Juventus
Serie A
November 8, 2026
FULL TIME
2-2
Stadio Artemio Franchi
Photo: Sailko / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 3.0, cropped

Juventus left Florence with a 2-2 draw on 8 November 2026 that felt less like a point gained than two dropped. Nick Woltemade's first Serie A goal and a Gleison Bremer header cancelled out strikes from Mateo Pellegrino and Alieu Njie, but the underlying numbers tell a story of a side generating plenty without converting dominance into wins. The result leaves Juventus on 18 points from 11 games (5-3-3), a return of 1.64 points per game under Luciano Spalletti. That is well below the 2.71 points per game Massimo Carrera's Juventus managed over seven league games in 2012/13 (6W 1D 0L). The comparison is not perfect — seven games is a small window — but it frames the central question of Juventus's season: why does a team with this much attacking volume keep dropping points?

The numbers behind the stalemate

Juventus had 59% possession, 18 shots to Fiorentina's 22, six shots on target each, 38 touches in the opposition box to Fiorentina's 25, 12 corners to five, and 137 successful final-third passes to 71. Their expected goals (xG) of 2.42 was nearly double their season average of 1.18 across earlier 2026/27 matches in all competitions. Set-piece xG alone was 1.3, against an average of 0.38. Yet Fiorentina won 65% of their tackles to Juventus's 31%, and had more shots overall. This was not a case of one side being clearly better; it was a game of contrasting strengths. Juventus controlled the ball and created from wide areas and set pieces, while Fiorentina were more direct and more aggressive in the duel.

The pattern is familiar. Before this match, Juventus had beaten Napoli 2-0 and AZ Alkmaar 2-1, but had also lost 2-0 at Genoa and drawn 2-2 with Rennes in the Europa League. The wins showed what the side can do when the final-third dominance translates into goals; the draws and defeats show what happens when it does not.

Squad turnover and the missing balance

Juventus's summer business was significant. Pape Sarr, Giacomo Faticanti, Jhon Lucumí, Guglielmo Vicario, Nick Woltemade and Randal Kolo Muani arrived. Douglas Luiz, Facundo González, Giovanni Daffara, Jonathan David, Loïs Openda and Dušan Vlahović departed. That is a lot of change in one window, and it shows. The injury list for this match — Locatelli, Yildiz, K. Thuram, Conceição, Cambiaso, Nico González and Grabara — removed further options. Spalletti has had to build a new midfield and attack while missing key pieces.

Whether the gap is down to squad turnover, tactics, or the simple fact that seven games is too small a sample to draw firm conclusions is not yet clear. What is clear is that the process — possession, territory, final-third passing, corners — is stronger than the points return. Against Fiorentina, Juventus had 12 corners against an average of 6.8 in earlier matches, and 38 box touches against an average of 29.6. The attacking volume was there. The finishing and the defensive solidity were not.

Woltemade's goal was a positive. He was substituted in the 57th minute, replaced by Edon Zhegrova. Whether that change was injury-related or tactical is not yet known. Fiorentina have nine points from 11 games (2-3-6).

Juventus's next matches will show whether the attacking volume can be converted into wins more consistently, or whether the gap between process and points is a deeper problem. The returns of Locatelli, Yildiz and others may help. But the 2012/13 comparison will linger until the points per game start to climb.

Sources

  1. [1]FotMob
  2. [2]espn.in
  3. [3]livescore.com
  4. [4]bbc.com
  5. [5]sports.yahoo.com
Peter Olaleru

Editor

Peter Olaleru

Peter is the editor of Measured Take and a cybersecurity professional. He leads our news, fact checks and sport from around the world, with a particular eye on cyber attacks, data breaches, scams, AI and misinformation.

TweetLinkedIn

Reader notes

Loading comments...