UEFA Champions LeagueNovember 3, 20263 min readBy Peter OlaleruEditor

Batrakov Double Puts Galatasaray in Control at the Break

Aleksey Batrakov scored twice in three minutes as Galatasaray led Stuttgart 2-0 at half-time in the Champions League at RAMS Park.

Updated November 3, 2026

TweetLinkedIn
Report an issue
Galatasaray vs VfB Stuttgart
November 3, 2026
HALF TIME
2-0
RAMS Park

Batrakov Strikes Twice in Three Minutes

Aleksey Batrakov scored twice in three first-half minutes as Galatasaray took a 2-0 lead over VfB Stuttgart into the break at RAMS Park. The 12th-minute opener came from open play, Batrakov finishing right-footed without an assist. Three minutes later, Davinson Sánchez supplied the pass and Batrakov converted again, this time from a move worth 0.15 expected goals.

Match stats at half-time

Galatasaray created the better chances: 0.76 xG to 0.70.

GalatasarayVfB Stuttgart
PossessionGalatasaray · Possession: 58%VfB Stuttgart · Possession: 42%58%42%xGGalatasaray · xG: 0.76VfB Stuttgart · xG: 0.700.760.70ShotsGalatasaray · Shots: 7VfB Stuttgart · Shots: 575On targetGalatasaray · On target: 3VfB Stuttgart · On target: 030Big chancesGalatasaray · Big chances: 2VfB Stuttgart · Big chances: 222Box touchesGalatasaray · Box touches: 11VfB Stuttgart · Box touches: 101110CornersGalatasaray · Corners: 4VfB Stuttgart · Corners: 242
Source: FotMob

The double gives Batrakov 0.52 xG for the half — more than two-thirds of Galatasaray's entire first-half output of 0.76. Stuttgart, by contrast, generated 0.70 xG and did not register a single shot on target. Galatasaray put three of their seven attempts on target; Stuttgart managed none from five.

Possession Without Penetration

Galatasaray's 58 percent possession translated into 140 accurate passes at 76 percent, against Stuttgart's 93 at 72 percent. The hosts also edged opposition-half passes 62-56 and duels 26-21. But the chance-creation numbers are tighter than the scoreline suggests: Stuttgart's 0.70 xG came entirely from open play, while Galatasaray needed 0.15 from set plays to reach 0.76. Big chances finished level at 2-2, and touches in the box were nearly identical — 11 for Galatasaray, 10 for Stuttgart.

Jamie Leweling was Stuttgart's most dangerous outlet with 0.57 xG, but the visitors could not turn that into a shot on target. Barış Alper Yılmaz had a quiet half for Galatasaray at 0.01 xG, while Yunus Akgün's contribution did not register a measurable xG value.

Shots by player

Aleksey Batrakov and Victor Osimhen had the most shots, 3 each.

Figures in shots

GalatasarayVfB Stuttgart
0123Aleksey BatrakovAleksey BatrakovAleksey Batrakov: 33Victor OsimhenVictor OsimhenVictor Osimhen: 33Jamie LewelingJamie LewelingJamie Leweling: 22Barış Alper YılmazBarış Alper YılmazBarış Alper Yılmaz: 11Bilal El KhannoussBilal El KhannoussBilal El Khannouss: 11Chris FührichChris FührichChris Führich: 11
Source: FotMob

Discipline and Shape

Galatasaray lined up in a 4-2-3-1; Stuttgart set up in a 3-4-1-2. The German side committed seven fouls to Galatasaray's four and collected three yellow cards to the hosts' one — a sign of how often they were second to the ball in midfield. Stuttgart's back three faced constant pressure from Batrakov's movement between the lines, and the second goal exposed the gap between the wide centre-backs and the wing-backs.

Sánchez's assist on the second goal was the only registered helper of the half. Galatasaray's four corners to Stuttgart's two reflect their territorial edge, but the expected-goals margin — 0.76 to 0.70 — is the thinnest possible. Stuttgart have created enough to believe a goal is available if they can find the target after the break. Galatasaray, meanwhile, have the cushion and the finisher.

Sources

  1. [1]FotMob
  2. [2]Photo: 1886kusagi / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0, cropped
Peter Olaleru

Editor

Peter Olaleru

Peter is the editor of Measured Take and a cybersecurity professional. He leads our news, fact checks, sport and guides from around the world, with a particular eye on cyber attacks, data breaches, scams, AI and misinformation.

TweetLinkedIn

Reader notes

Loading comments...