Premier LeagueOctober 25, 20263 min readBy Peter OlaleruEditor & Founder

Palace Go Three At The Back As Newcastle Name Their Hand For Selhurst Test

Crystal Palace name a 3-4-2-1 and Newcastle a 4-2-3-1 at Selhurst Park, with Adam Wharton, Amar Dedić, Anan Khalaili, Axel Disasi and Chris Richards in the conf

TweetLinkedIn
Report an issue
Crystal Palace vs Newcastle United
Premier League
October 25, 2026
LIVE
0-0
Selhurst Park

Crystal Palace and Newcastle United have confirmed their starting XIs for Sunday's Premier League meeting at Selhurst Park, and the two shapes point to contrasting plans. Palace set up in a 3-4-2-1. Newcastle answer with a 4-2-3-1.

Kick-off is at Selhurst Park with the scoreboard blank at 0-0. The team sheets are in, and the selections carry the pre-match talking points: how Palace's back three copes with Newcastle's front four, and whether the hosts' two attacking midfielders can find room between Newcastle's double pivot and back line.

Palace's Back Three And The Wharton Question

Palace's 3-4-2-1 puts three centre-backs behind a four-man midfield and two No. 10s ahead of them. Chris Richards and Axel Disasi are named in that defensive unit, giving Palace the height and duel-winning presence the shape demands. The wing-backs must supply the width; the two attacking midfielders must connect the midfield four to the lone striker.

Adam Wharton is the name to watch in the middle. In a 3-4-2-1, the central midfield pair has to progress the ball through the first line of pressure and then feed the two No. 10s in the half-spaces. Wharton's passing range is the mechanism that makes the shape work rather than merely exist. If Newcastle's 4-2-3-1 presses the Palace midfield pair with its attacking midfielders, Wharton's ability to break lines becomes the escape valve.

Amar Dedić and Anan Khalaili are also in the confirmed Palace XI. Their roles will be defined by the shape: whether they operate as wing-backs asked to run the full length of the flank, or as wide players tucking into the midfield four. Either way, Palace's width in the 3-4-2-1 comes from those wide positions, not from the front three.

Newcastle's 4-2-3-1 And The Space It Leaves

Newcastle's 4-2-3-1 is the more familiar structure: a back four, a double pivot, three attacking midfielders behind a single striker. Against a back three, the matchup question is whether Newcastle's No. 10 can find pockets between Palace's midfield four and defensive three, and whether the wide attackers can isolate Palace's wing-backs in one-v-one situations.

The double pivot is the control point. If Newcastle's two holding midfielders can dominate the ball and screen the space in front of the back four, Palace's two No. 10s will be starved of service. If Palace's midfield four can press that pivot, Newcastle's build-up becomes sideways and the front four get isolated.

That is the central contest: Palace's 3-4-2-1 against Newcastle's 4-2-3-1, with Wharton, Dedić, Khalaili, Disasi and Richards all named for the hosts. The shapes are confirmed. The first whistle will show which one imposes itself.

What The Selections Say

Palace have gone with the back three, which means three centre-backs are trusted to defend the box while the wing-backs push high. Newcastle have gone with the 4-2-3-1, which means the double pivot is trusted to protect the back four and let the front four attack.

Both managers have named their hands. The pre-match tactical questions are now on the pitch: can Palace's midfield four outnumber Newcastle's double pivot, and can Newcastle's front four exploit the space behind Palace's wing-backs? The answers start at kick-off.

Sources

  1. [1]FotMob
  2. [2]Photo: Arne Müseler / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0 de, cropped
Peter Olaleru

Editor & Founder

Peter Olaleru

Peter is the founder and editor of Measured Take and a cybersecurity professional. He leads our news, fact checks, sport and guides from around the world, with a particular eye on cyber attacks, data breaches, scams, AI and misinformation.

TweetLinkedIn

Reader notes

Loading comments...