The claim
“The types of transgressions that can impact a political campaign have changed significantly over time”
The John Curley Show on KIRO Newsradio
Our verdict
Mostly True
The claim that the types of transgressions affecting campaigns have changed over time is supported by research showing scandals now have less impact and voters prioritize policy performance, suggesting a shift from personal moral transgressions to issues like spending and public trust.
What we found
The claim that the types of transgressions affecting campaigns have changed over time is supported by research showing scandals now have less impact and voters prioritize policy performance, suggesting a shift from personal moral transgressions to issues like spending and public trust.
The evidence
2 sources, all background: none settles the claim either way.
- Background
University of Houston study finds scandals have less impact on politicians today than in past eras, indicating a shift in what kinds of transgressions matter for campaigns.
uh.edu· Research on declining scandal impact - Background
Voters base candidate choice primarily on policy issues and government performance rather than personal characteristics, reflecting a changing landscape of what transgressions are salient.
icpsr.umich.edu· Voter decision‑making factors
How we checked
We reviewed 2 relevant sources.
Have evidence we missed?
If you know of a source that confirms or contradicts this claim, send us the link. We review every submission and update fact checks when new evidence changes the picture.
Measured Take updates fact checks when new evidence emerges. Corrections are noted on the page.
All fact checks