Napoli 1–0 Roma at Half-Time: Anguissa's Overhead Kick Punishes Roma's Waste
Frank Anguissa's 28th-minute overhead kick has Napoli 1–0 up on Roma at half-time, despite Roma's 56% possession and 11 shots at the Maradona.
Updated October 24, 2026
- Match
- Napoli vs Roma
- Competition
- Serie A
- Kick-off
- October 24, 2026
- Status
- HALF TIME
- Score
- 2-1

Napoli lead Roma 1–0 at half-time at the Stadio Diego Armando Maradona, and the scoreline is doing something the underlying numbers are not. Roma have had more of the ball, more shots, and far more touches in the box. Napoli have the goal, the better chances, and the only lead that matters.
Anguissa's overhead kick decides a half Roma controlled
Frank Anguissa put Napoli ahead in the 28th minute with an overhead kick from a set piece. The chance was worth 0.05 xG — a low-percentage finish that Anguissa converted anyway. It was Napoli's only set-piece goal of the half, and it came against the run of play in the loosest sense: Roma had been the more progressive side, but Napoli had already shown they could create the cleaner looks.
Roma's response was immediate in intent but not in end product. Bryan Cristante was booked on 30 minutes, two minutes after the goal, and Devyne Rensch followed him into the book on the stroke of half-time. Two yellow cards in the first half for a side chasing the game tells you how the fouls were falling: Roma committed six to Napoli's five, and the duels were nearly even at 25–22 in Roma's favour. The territorial control was real. The control of the scoreline was not.
Territory without teeth: Roma's 23 box touches produce one shot on target
Roma's first-half numbers are the story of a team that got where it wanted to go and did not know what to do when it arrived. They had 56% possession, 11 shots to Napoli's eight, and 23 touches in the box to Napoli's 11. They also had one shot on target. Napoli had four.
Match stats at half-time
Napoli created the better chances: 1.24 xG to 0.66.
The expected goals split makes the same point from the other direction. Napoli generated 1.24 xG in the first half; Roma generated 0.66. Napoli's open-play xG alone (1.19) nearly doubled Roma's total. The set-piece xG was 0.05 to 0.01 — Anguissa's overhead kick was the only meaningful dead-ball chance either side created, and it went in.
Shots by player
Bryan Cristante and Mario Hermoso had the most shots, 3 each.
Figures in shots
Roma's shape, a 3-4-2-1, gave them the width and the midfield numbers to circulate the ball and push the wing-backs high. Napoli's 4-3-3 sat deeper and conceded the possession battle deliberately, then attacked the spaces Roma left behind. The shot count favours Roma. The shot quality, the big chances (2–0 Napoli), and the scoreboard all favour Napoli.
The players deciding it
Anguissa has the goal, but the chance-creation map is more interesting than the scoreline suggests. Mathías Olivera posted 0.69 xG in the first half — the highest of any player on the pitch — without scoring. Rasmus Højlund added 0.39 xG. Those two alone account for more than Roma's entire first-half output. Matias Soulé managed 0.04 xG for Roma; Wesley 0.13. The visitors' attacking players got into the box but did not get into the positions that produce goals.
Roma's problem at half-time is not that they have been outplayed. They have not. It is that they have spent 45 minutes winning the ball, moving it forward, and arriving in the final third without the final action. Napoli have spent 45 minutes defending, waiting, and taking the one clear opening they were given. Anguissa's overhead kick was worth 0.05 xG. It is currently worth the match.
Roma need a goal and have the territory to find one. Napoli need to survive 45 minutes with a lead they have not entirely earned on the balance of play but have fully earned on the balance of chances. The second half will tell us whether Roma's volume eventually tells or whether Napoli's efficiency holds.
Sources

Editor & Founder
Peter OlaleruPeter is the founder and editor of Measured Take and a cybersecurity professional. He leads our news, fact checks, sport and guides from around the world, with a particular eye on cyber attacks, data breaches, scams, AI and misinformation.
More from Sports
Conversation
Reader notes
Loading comments...

