OpinionSportsNovember 6, 20265 min readBy The Measured Take view

Hussey's brief runs to Los Angeles: has Cricket Australia finally stopped firefighting?

Cricket Australia's decision to formalise Michael Hussey's role through 2028 signals a deliberate shift toward long-term planning and continuity, rather th

TweetLinkedIn
Report an issue
Red cricket ball on grass, for a story on Hussey's brief running to Los Angeles
Photo: Unsplash

Michael Hussey will be a coaching consultant for the 2027 Ashes and the 2027 ODI World Cup, and a T20 advisor for the 2028 T20 World Cup and the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics. That is the fact Cricket Australia confirmed on 6 November 2026, and it is more revealing than the usual appointment notice. For years, Hussey's work with the national side amounted to a short burst before the annual Perth Test, an additional batting consultant drafted in when a specific challenge loomed. Now his brief stretches across three formats and two years, taking in an Ashes series in England that begins at Trent Bridge on 18 June, a home T20I series against England starting 21 November, and tournaments on two continents. The shift is not merely administrative. It is a statement about how Australia intend to prepare for the most congested multi-format cycle in recent memory.

The case for continuity is straightforward. Australia's batting was exposed in a 2-1 Test series defeat in South Africa, and the response could easily have been another short-term fix: bring in a familiar face before the Ashes, extract what value you can, and part ways. Instead, Cricket Australia has given Hussey a formal role that runs through the 2027 ODI World Cup and into 2028. That matters because batting planning is not a switch that flips on the eve of a tour. The transition from red-ball to white-ball cricket, the identification of players who can handle both, and the construction of T20 batting orders for a World Cup and an Olympic tournament require someone who has seen the group across formats and across seasons. Hussey's previous assignments were useful precisely because he knew the players; a longer brief allows that knowledge to compound rather than reset each time.

There is also the question of what Hussey himself wanted. He said he was 'extremely excited' about a 'more formal and meaningful role', language that suggests the previous arrangement was neither. He had reportedly turned down an informal approach from England's new red-ball coach, Stephen Fleming, to be Test batting mentor. Whatever the merits of that decision, it indicates that Hussey was not simply filling a gap. He chose a defined Australian brief over an English approach, and Cricket Australia has responded by defining it further. For a coaching staff under Andrew McDonald, that is a useful signal: the batting consultant is not a visiting lecturer but a recurring presence in the planning.

The strongest argument against this appointment is that formalising a consultancy does not guarantee continuity. Hussey's role may remain part-time, and the announcement does not say otherwise. If he is engaged for specific windows rather than the full cycle, the difference between this arrangement and the previous ad-hoc model may be one of paperwork rather than practice. There is also the question of overlap. Australia already have a coaching staff, and Hussey's T20 advisory brief will sit alongside existing T20 coaching responsibilities. Without clarity on how those roles interact, there is a risk of duplication, conflicting messages, or a consultant whose influence is diluted by the very structure that formalised him. The impact on Australia's batting and T20 planning is, on the available facts, uncertain.

That is a fair objection, and it deserves a fair answer. The value of a formal brief is not that it guarantees full-time presence; it is that it establishes a through-line. A consultant who knows he will be involved through the 2027 Ashes, the 2027 ODI World Cup, the 2028 T20 World Cup and the LA Olympics can be consulted on selection, batting orders and player development in a way that a pre-tour cameo cannot. The alternative — another short-term appointment before each major event — is precisely the model that left Australia's batting support reactive. Formalising the role does not solve every question about hours or hierarchy, but it changes the starting point from 'who can we get for this tour' to 'how does this fit the next two years'. That is a meaningful difference, even if the exact mechanics remain to be seen.

What is not yet known is substantial. The dates and venues for the 2027 ODI World Cup have not been confirmed in the material available. Nor have the dates and venues for cricket at the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics. Whether Hussey's role will be full-time or remain consultancy-based across the cycle is also unstated. Those are not trivial gaps, and they are the kind of details that will determine whether this appointment is remembered as a structural improvement or a well-intentioned label. But the direction of travel is clear. Cricket Australia has looked at a batting group that struggled in South Africa and decided that the answer is not another temporary patch. It has tied Michael Hussey to the 2027 Ashes, the 2027 ODI World Cup, the 2028 T20 World Cup and the LA Olympics. His first assignment is the home T20I series against England, starting 21 November. The rest will be judged over two years, not two weeks.

Sources

  1. [1]news18.com
  2. [2]openthemagazine.com
  3. [3]sportscapemagazine.com
  4. [4]timesofindia.indiatimes.com
  5. [5]news.abplive.com
  6. [6]icc-cricket.com
TweetLinkedIn

Reader notes

Loading comments...