Premier LeagueOctober 31, 20263 min readBy Peter OlaleruEditor

Chelsea 0-0 Manchester United at Half-Time: Amad Diallo Leads the Line as xG Gap Widens

Half-time at Stamford Bridge: Chelsea 0-0 Manchester United. United lead xG 1.01 to 0.28, with Amad Diallo's 0.47 xG the standout first-half number.

Updated October 31, 2026

TweetLinkedIn
Report an issue
Chelsea vs Manchester United
Premier League
October 31, 2026
HALF TIME
2-0
Stamford Bridge

Amad Diallo Drives United's Edge

Chelsea and Manchester United go into the break level at 0-0 at Stamford Bridge, but the first-half numbers belong to the visitors. United have generated 1.01 expected goals to Chelsea's 0.28, with the open-play split even more pronounced: 0.97 to 0.14. Ruben Amorim's side have taken 9 shots to Chelsea's 7, and both teams have put 3 on target.

The individual story is Amad Diallo. The winger leads all players with 0.47 xG, more than Chelsea's entire first-half output. Bruno Fernandes sits second on 0.32 xG, meaning United's right-sided and central creators have combined for 0.79 of the visitors' 1.01. Matheus Cunha has added 0.16 xG, while Estêvão's 0.04 is Chelsea's only listed individual contribution of note.

Match stats at half-time

Manchester United created the better chances: 1.01 xG to 0.28.

ChelseaManchester United
PossessionChelsea · Possession: 49%Manchester United · Possession: 51%49%51%xGChelsea · xG: 0.28Manchester United · xG: 1.010.281.01ShotsChelsea · Shots: 7Manchester United · Shots: 979On targetChelsea · On target: 3Manchester United · On target: 333Big chancesChelsea · Big chances: 1Manchester United · Big chances: 313Box touchesChelsea · Box touches: 17Manchester United · Box touches: 181718CornersChelsea · Corners: 3Manchester United · Corners: 636
Source: FotMob

Two 4-2-3-1s, One Clear Pattern

Both managers have set up in 4-2-3-1, and the shapes have produced a first half of contrasting routes to goal. United's threat has come almost entirely from open play — 0.97 of their 1.01 xG — while Chelsea's 0.28 is split almost evenly between open play (0.14) and set plays (0.13). That set-play share is the only department where Chelsea lead: 0.13 to 0.04.

Possession is effectively even at 49-51, and United have completed 93 passes in the opposition half to Chelsea's 85. But Chelsea's passing has been cleaner — 175 accurate passes at 83% to United's 167 at 77%. The hosts have also won more duels, 28 to 23, and committed fewer fouls, 3 to 8. Neither side has a yellow card.

Shots by player

Amad Diallo had the most shots, 4.

Figures in shots

ChelseaManchester United
024Amad DialloAmad DialloAmad Diallo: 44Bruno FernandesBruno FernandesBruno Fernandes: 22EstêvãoEstêvãoEstêvão: 22Pedro NetoPedro NetoPedro Neto: 22Wesley FofanaWesley FofanaWesley Fofana: 22Andrey SantosAndrey SantosAndrey Santos: 11
Source: FotMob

Box touches are level at 17-18, and corners favour United 6-3. The big-chance count is where the visitors have separated themselves: 3 to 1. That gap, combined with the xG differential, explains why the scoreline flatters Chelsea at the interval.

What the Second Half Needs

Chelsea's problem is chance quality. Seven shots and 17 box touches have produced 0.28 xG and a single big chance. Estêvão's 0.04 xG is the only Chelsea individual figure listed, and the hosts' set-play edge — 0.13 xG — is their most productive avenue so far.

United will feel they should be ahead. Diallo's 0.47 xG and Fernandes' 0.32 have not been converted, and three big chances have gone begging. Bryan Mbeumo has yet to register an xG figure. If the visitors keep generating at this rate, the second half is theirs to lose. If Chelsea tighten the open-play supply line that has fed Diallo and Fernandes, the game resets.

Sources

  1. [1]FotMob
  2. [2]Photo: Arne Müseler / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 3.0 de, cropped
Peter Olaleru

Editor

Peter Olaleru

Peter is the editor of Measured Take and a cybersecurity professional. He leads our news, fact checks, sport and guides from around the world, with a particular eye on cyber attacks, data breaches, scams, AI and misinformation.

TweetLinkedIn

Reader notes

Loading comments...