UEFA Champions LeagueNovember 4, 20263 min readBy Peter OlaleruEditor

Como Run Riot at Bollaert: Douvikas Hat-Trick Puts Lens to the Sword in Seven-Goal First Half

Como lead Lens 7-1 at half-time in the Champions League. Douvikas scores a hat-trick, Nico Paz stars, and the xG battle is just as one-sided.

Updated November 4, 2026

TweetLinkedIn
Report an issue
Lens vs Como
November 4, 2026
HALF TIME
1-7
Stade Bollaert-Delelis

Como have dismantled Lens at Stade Bollaert-Delelis, leading 7-1 at half-time in this Champions League fixture. Anastasios Douvikas scored a hat-trick inside 57 minutes, Nico Paz added a goal and two assists, and the visitors from Italy have turned a hostile away trip into a procession.

The scoreline is extraordinary. The underlying numbers are almost as emphatic. Como generated 1.82 expected goals in the first half alone, compared to Lens's 0.30. They had eight shots to Lens's five, four on target to Lens's two, and 15 touches in the opposition box to Lens's four. This was not a smash-and-grab. It was a systematic unravelling.

Douvikas Sets the Tone

The tone was set in the seventh minute. Máximo Perrone delivered a corner and Douvikas finished right-footed from close range, a chance worth 0.78 xG. Lens's back three of Jonathan Gradit, Kevin Danso and Facundo Medina never settled. Douvikas doubled the lead on 32 minutes, converting Álex Valle's assist with a right-footed finish worth 0.65 xG. By the time Nico Paz made it 3-0 on 40 minutes, finishing a fast break assisted by Douvikas, the home side were chasing shadows.

Lens lined up in a 3-4-2-1, with Ruben Aguilar and Deiver Machado as wing-backs and Florian Thauvin and Adrien Thomasson behind Elye Wahi. Como's 4-2-3-1, with Paz central and Douvikas leading the line, found space repeatedly between Lens's wing-backs and centre-backs. The first-half passing numbers reflect the control: Como completed 254 passes at 89% accuracy, Lens 202 at 86%. In the opposition half, Como made 94 passes to Lens's 75.

Set Pieces and Second Balls

Lens's set-piece defending was a particular problem. Como generated 0.96 xG from set plays in the first half, compared to Lens's 0.09. Douvikas's opener came from a corner, and the pattern repeated after the break. Marc-Oliver Kempf headed home Luis Milla's delivery on 54 minutes, and Douvikas completed his hat-trick on 57 minutes from Nico Paz's assist. Lucas Da Cunha had already made it 4-0 on 47 minutes, finishing left-footed from another Paz pass.

Lens did get one back. Ruben Aguilar scored from Florian Thauvin's corner on 65 minutes, a right-footed finish worth just 0.06 xG. It was the briefest of respites. Mattia Liberali restored the six-goal cushion on 62 minutes, finishing Jacobo Ramón's assist, before Aguilar's goal. The second half is still young, but the pattern is set.

What It Means

For Lens, this is a damage-limitation exercise. They have won 32 duels to Como's 35, but they have been outrun and outthought in every decisive area. Wahi has been isolated, Thauvin and Thomasson have dropped deep to find the ball, and the wing-backs have been pinned back. A yellow card for one Lens player in the first half reflects frustration rather than control.

For Como, this is a statement. Douvikas now has three goals from 1.7 xG, Paz has a goal and two assists, and the team has scored seven times from 3.28 xG across the match so far. The chance creation is not a fluke. It is the product of a midfield that has dominated second balls and a forward line that has punished every mistake.

The second half will tell us whether Lens can restore any pride, or whether Como will add to a scoreline that already feels historic. On this evidence, the visitors will not take their foot off the gas.

Sources

  1. [1]FotMob
  2. [2]Photo: Liondartois / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0, cropped
Peter Olaleru

Editor

Peter Olaleru

Peter is the editor of Measured Take and a cybersecurity professional. He leads our news, fact checks, sport and guides from around the world, with a particular eye on cyber attacks, data breaches, scams, AI and misinformation.

TweetLinkedIn

Reader notes

Loading comments...