Ligue 1October 30, 20263 min readBy Peter OlaleruEditor & Founder

Le Havre 1-2 PSG at Half-Time: Maja's Fast Break Punishes PSG, but Hakimi and Godts Flip the Script

Josh Maja's fast break gave Le Havre a shock lead, but PSG hit back through Mika Godts and Achraf Hakimi to lead 2-1 at half-time in Ligue 1.

Updated October 30, 2026

TweetLinkedIn
Report an issue
Le Havre vs Paris Saint-Germain
Ligue 1
October 30, 2026
HALF TIME
1-5
Soccer field — PSG Head to Le Havre With a Thin Squad and a Point to Prove

Le Havre's 3-4-3 had one job at the Stade CMA CGM Océane: survive the first wave. For 18 minutes, it did more than that. Rayan Fofana slipped a pass into the channel, Josh Maja ran onto it, and the striker finished left-footed on a fast break worth 0.93 xG. The home side led 1-0. The stadium erupted. PSG, 76% of the ball and nothing to show for it, had been sucker-punched.

Match stats at half-time

Le Havre created the better chances: 1.29 xG to 1.22.

Le HavreParis Saint-Germain
PossessionLe Havre · Possession: 24%Paris Saint-Germain · Possession: 76%24%76%xGLe Havre · xG: 1.29Paris Saint-Germain · xG: 1.221.291.22ShotsLe Havre · Shots: 8Paris Saint-Germain · Shots: 787On targetLe Havre · On target: 1Paris Saint-Germain · On target: 515Big chancesLe Havre · Big chances: 2Paris Saint-Germain · Big chances: 222Box touchesLe Havre · Box touches: 12Paris Saint-Germain · Box touches: 171217CornersLe Havre · Corners: 1Paris Saint-Germain · Corners: 212
Source: FotMob

PSG's Response: Two Goals in Three Minutes

Luis Enrique's 4-3-3 does not panic. It recycles, probes, and waits for the full-backs to arrive. In the 26th minute, Achraf Hakimi collected the ball on the right and slid it across for Mika Godts, who finished right-footed from 0.28 xG. Two minutes later, Senny Mayulu returned the favour, finding Hakimi inside the box. The Moroccan's right-footed strike carried just 0.10 xG, but the placement was precise. PSG led 2-1, and the game had flipped in the time it takes to refresh a match feed.

The Numbers Behind the Scoreline

Le Havre's 24% possession is not a typo. PSG completed 374 passes to Le Havre's 95, and 185 of those came in the opposition half. Yet the xG battle reads 1.29 to 1.22 in Le Havre's favour. The home side managed eight shots to PSG's seven, and both teams created two big chances. The difference: PSG put five shots on target to Le Havre's one. Maja's goal was the game's clearest opportunity, but Ferrán Torres (0.41 xG) and Djibril Ouziad (0.03 xG) have yet to convert for the visitors.

Shots by player

Achraf Hakimi and Djibril Ouziad had the most shots, 2 each.

Figures in shots

Le HavreParis Saint-Germain
012Achraf HakimiAchraf HakimiAchraf Hakimi: 22Djibril OuziadDjibril OuziadDjibril Ouziad: 22Ferrán TorresFerrán TorresFerrán Torres: 22Rayan FofanaRayan FofanaRayan Fofana: 22Ahmed ToubaAhmed ToubaAhmed Touba: 11Amir RichardsonAmir RichardsonAmir Richardson: 11
Source: FotMob

Le Havre's 3-4-3 has defended narrow, forcing PSG wide, but the champions' full-backs have been the release valve. Hakimi's goal and assist make him the first-half protagonist. Godts' equaliser was his first Ligue 1 goal for PSG. Maja, meanwhile, has been Le Havre's lone outlet: his 0.93 xG is more than double any other player on the pitch.

What the Second Half Needs

Le Havre have won 25 duels to PSG's 20, and their 12 touches in the box suggest the fast breaks are not a one-off. But one shot on target from eight attempts is a finishing problem, not a creation problem. PSG, for their part, have been clinical when it matters: two goals from 1.22 xG. The defending champions lead at the break, but the xG scoreline says this is far from over. Le Havre need to keep finding Maja in space. PSG need to stop them.

Sources

  1. [1]FotMob
  2. [2]Photo: Unsplash
Peter Olaleru

Editor & Founder

Peter Olaleru

Peter is the founder and editor of Measured Take and a cybersecurity professional. He leads our news, fact checks, sport and guides from around the world, with a particular eye on cyber attacks, data breaches, scams, AI and misinformation.

TweetLinkedIn

Reader notes

Loading comments...