US Treasury Sanctions 12 Actors in IRGC Oil Sales to China
Treasury freezes $500M in crypto, disrupts billions in Iranian oil revenue, and sanctions 12 entities linked to IRGC oil sales to China.

U.S. Department of the Treasury
TL;DR
The U.S. Treasury sanctioned 12 individuals and firms for enabling IRGC oil shipments to China, freezing $500 million in crypto and disrupting billions in projected revenue.
Context The Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control announced the designations as part of the “Economic Fury” campaign, a continuation of maximum‑pressure tactics aimed at Iran’s military and nuclear programs. The sanctions follow a pattern of targeting the financial networks that move Iranian oil abroad, especially to China, which remains a key buyer.
Key Facts - Twelve entities, including three senior IRGC oil officials—chief Ahmad Mohammadi Zadeh, finance chief Samad Fathi Salami, and commercial chief Mohammadreza Ashrafi Ghehi—were placed on the sanctions list. - Front companies such as Golden Globe Demir Celik and Hong Kong‑based Blue Ocean Limited were identified as conduits for payments and foreign‑currency handling. - Nine additional firms operating in Hong Kong, Dubai, Sharjah and Oman were cited for facilitating shipments worth tens of millions of dollars in 2025. - Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the move will keep cutting off regime funding for weapons, proxies and nuclear ambitions. - The Treasury reported that the action disrupted billions of dollars in projected Iranian oil revenue and froze nearly $500 million in regime‑linked cryptocurrency. - The agency warned of secondary sanctions on foreign financial institutions that aid Iran’s oil trade, including those linked to China’s “teapot” refineries.
What It Means The designations tighten the financial noose around the IRGC’s oil export chain, limiting its ability to convert oil sales into cash and crypto assets. By targeting both senior officials and the shell companies that mask transactions, the Treasury aims to force Iran to seek alternative, less efficient routes for revenue. The threat of secondary sanctions signals that banks and traders outside the U.S. could face penalties for facilitating any part of the illicit oil flow.
Watch for further Treasury actions against entities in the broader shadow‑banking network and for any diplomatic response from China or the United Arab Emirates, whose firms appear in the list.
Continue reading
More in this thread
Conversation
Reader notes
Loading comments...