Torrington Schools Draft AI Policy on Learning Integrity

Torrington’s Board of Education co‑chair Edward Corey described the situation as the "Wild West," noting that some students rely on AI for every task while others avoid it entirely. Teachers say they need clarity on what is acceptable and what is not.

Paula Adams, a parent with a junior at Torrington High School, said having AI create work for students removes the opportunity to learn. She acknowledged that AI is here to stay and can be helpful, but stressed that children must use their own brains to think and create.

Some teachers have experimented with AI to draft parent communications, citing time savings. Officials say they are reviewing whether such assistance falls under acceptable use.

Superintendent Michael Wilson declared that using AI to write or grade papers is unacceptable. He said the district is exploring whether to adopt school‑specific AI tools or to avoid the technology altogether, while emphasizing academic integrity.

An ad hoc committee is gathering input from teachers and administrators to shape the policy. Adams said she wants to join the conversation, and the board plans to bring parents into the discussion over the next month or two.

What this means for Torrington classrooms is that a clear framework could soon define when AI may assist—such as editing emails—or when it must be barred, like completing essays or evaluating student work. The policy will aim to balance potential benefits with the need to preserve independent learning.

Watch for the board’s draft policy release and the first public forum where parents and teachers can comment on the proposed guidelines.