Judge Abdulmalik Bars Journalists from Trial of Alleged Tinubu Coup Plotters

A Nigerian Federal High Court judge ejected journalists from a high-profile trial involving six alleged coup plotters. Judge Joyce Abdulmalik issued the order on Monday, blocking public access to proceedings for defendants accused of plotting to overthrow President Bola Tinubu’s administration. This decision restricted media presence for a case slated to begin calling witnesses.

The six individuals, including retired Major General Mohammed Ibrahim Gana, retired Naval Captain Erasmus Ochegobia Victor, and serving Police Inspector Ahmed Ibrahim, alongside three other civilians, were arraigned on April 22. They face a comprehensive 13-count charge, identified as case number FHC/ABJ/CR/206/2026.

These charges encompass serious offenses such as treason, terrorism, failure to disclose security intelligence, and money laundering in furtherance of terrorist acts. The Federal Government alleges the defendants conspired to levy war against the state in September 2025. Specifically, the prosecution stated that the defendants had prior knowledge of a planned treasonable act but "not used any reasonable efforts to prevent the commission of the offence."

The judge's directive to exclude the press came without a formal application for a secret trial from the prosecution. Security officers acted on explicit instructions from Justice Abdulmalik, ordering all media personnel to vacate the courtroom before proceedings commenced. This action directly contrasts with the usual practice of open court proceedings for matters of significant public interest.

This decision significantly restricts public oversight of a case concerning national security and the integrity of democratic governance. Open judicial proceedings typically ensure transparency and accountability, allowing the public to monitor legal processes and the administration of justice. The ongoing trial, now shielded from direct media scrutiny, addresses allegations of a serious threat to the nation's political stability.

Observers will monitor subsequent developments in the trial and any official statements regarding the transparency of future sessions. The public waits to see how this restriction impacts the perception of justice and democratic principles in such a critical national case.