White House Posts FDD Graphic, Iran Enrichment Data and Lobbying Spend Verified

### Claim 1 – White House X post used FDD graphic to blame Biden Evidence – The White House’s official rapid‑response account on X (formerly Twitter) posted a graphic created by the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD). The accompanying text asserted that Tehran’s uranium enrichment accelerated because sanctions were loosened under President Joe Biden. Independent reporting confirmed the post and its content. Verdict – True. Analysis – Both Al Jazeera and policy‑analysis outlets documented the exact post, establishing that the administration amplified FDD’s narrative. The consistency across sources gives high confidence in the claim’s accuracy.

### Claim 2 – JCPOA capped enrichment at 3.67% and enrichment rose after 2018 withdrawal Evidence – The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, signed in 2015, limited Iran’s uranium enrichment to 3.67%, far below the ~90% needed for weapons‑grade material. International Atomic Energy Agency reports and the deal’s text confirm the cap. After the United States withdrew in 2018 under President Donald Trump, Iran increased enrichment levels, a trend recorded in subsequent IAEA inspections. Verdict – True. Analysis – The cap and post‑withdrawal increase are well‑documented in public records and multiple news analyses. The factual basis is indisputable, supporting the claim without doubt.

### Claim 3 – FDD Action spent $150,000 on lobbying in Q1 2025 Evidence – Federal lobbying disclosures released for the first quarter of 2025 list FDD Action’s expenditures of $150,000. The spending targeted legislation on Iran sanctions, U.S. arms sales to Israel, and the United States‑Israel Defense Partnership Act of 2025. The figures appear in a news report that directly references the official disclosures. Verdict – True. Analysis – While the verification rests on a single news outlet, that outlet cites the government’s own lobbying database, which provides a reliable record. The moderate confidence rating reflects the limited source pool but does not undermine the factual nature of the expenditure.

What to watch next: Monitor future White House communications for additional think‑tank influence and track FDD Action’s lobbying filings for any shifts in policy focus.