Bundesliga1 hr ago

Bremen outscored the territory: 3-1 over Leipzig despite 71% possession against

Werder Bremen beat RB Leipzig 3-1 despite 71% possession against, with goals from Dinkçi, Füllkrug, and Grüll sealing the win.

Marcus Cole/4 min/GB

Published September 5, 2026 · Updated September 5, 2026

Werder Bremen vs RB Leipzig
Bundesliga
September 5, 2026
FULL TIME
3-1
TweetLinkedIn
Dinkçi's Early Strike Puts Bremen Ahead Against Territorial Leipzig

Dinkçi's Early Strike Puts Bremen Ahead Against Territorial Leipzig

Credit: Getty ImagesOriginal source

Bremen let Leipzig have the ball and punished them with the goals

Werder Bremen beat RB Leipzig 3-1 at the Weserstadion on Saturday, a result shaped less by shape than by what each side did with the ball. Leipzig ran 71% possession, took 19 shots, and recorded 39 touches in the Bremen box. Bremen had 29% of the ball, 12 shots, and 13 box touches. The scoreboard went the other way.

FULL TIMEBundesliga

Werder Bremen 3–1 RB Leipzig

Werder BremenRB Leipzig
0.95xG1.50
12Shots19
7On target5
29%Possession71%
13Box touches39
1Big chances2
2Corners7

Biggest gap: Corners 2–7.

READ THE FULL ANALYSIS
measuredtake.com
Werder Bremen 3–1 RB Leipzig. xG 0.95 to 1.50. Shots 12 to 19. On target 7 to 5. Possession 29 to 71. Box touches 13 to 39. Big chances 1 to 2. Corners 2 to 7.

The arithmetic is the story. Leipzig finished the match with an xG of 1.50 to Bremen's 0.95, a gap of 0.55, yet conceded two more goals than they scored. Bremen put seven shots on target to Leipzig's five. The visitors created two big chances to Bremen's one. They had seven corners to two. On every territorial count, Leipzig were ahead. On the only count that mattered, they were two goals behind before stoppage time.

Eren Dinkçi opened the scoring inside four minutes, finishing a right-footed chance from open play after a Chuki assist. The xG on the chance was 0.64, the most likely goal of the afternoon. Bremen did not need another clear-cut opening for another hour. They just needed to stay in the game and trust that the moments would come.

The second half turned on a corner, a counter, and a consolation

Marco Grüll's afternoon defined the efficiency gap. Operating from the right of Bremen's 4-2-3-1, he delivered the assist for the second goal and scored the third himself. The 68th-minute set-piece was flicked on for Niclas Füllkrug, who headed home from a 0.02 xG chance. Bremen generated 0.07 xG from set plays across the whole match. They did not need more than the one goal from it.

FULL TIMEBundesliga

RB Leipzig created more. Werder Bremen won.

Werder Bremen xG0.95
RB Leipzig xG1.50
ResultWerder Bremen 31 RB Leipzig
Shots1219
On target75
Box touches1339

xG 0.95–1.50. Score 3–1.

READ THE FULL ANALYSIS
measuredtake.com
Werder Bremen 3–1 RB Leipzig. xG 0.95 to 1.50. Shots 12 to 19. On target 7 to 5. Box touches 13 to 39.

Twelve minutes later Grüll finished from open play with his right foot, a chance carrying 0.06 xG. By that point Leipzig's territorial dominance had produced 1.06 open-play xG without a goal. The second-half xG split told the same story: Leipzig 0.92, Bremen 0.27. Bremen did less with the ball and took more from the match.

Leipzig pushed through the middle of the half. At 63 minutes Marco Rose sent on Tidiam Gomis for Johan Bakayoko. At 67 Bremen made a double change, bringing on Mick Schmetgens for Arthur and Paul Erevbenagie for Dinkçi, holding what they had. At 74 the home side replaced Füllkrug with Cedric Itten. At 75 Leipzig rolled the dice again, Marc Guiu on for Neil El Aynaoui. At 83 Bremen shut the game down with two more changes, Dariusz Stalmach for Chuki and Salim Musah for Youri Regeer.

Leipzig kept pressing. Antonio Nusa and Christopher Nkunku made way at 84 for Andrija Maksimovic and Samba Konaté. The breakthrough came in the fifth minute of stoppage time when Maksimovic's delivery was headed home by Ridle Baku. The xG on the header was 0.33, by some distance Leipzig's most likely chance of the day. It was too late and too isolated.

Where the points were really won

Bremen's two-goal margin was built on chance conversion, not chance creation. Dinkçi scored from a 0.64 xG chance, a finishing rate broadly in line with expectation. Füllkrug scored from a 0.02 xG chance, a finishing rate well above it. Grüll scored from a 0.06 xG chance, again well above expectation. Across their three goals Bremen accumulated 0.72 xG of chance quality and scored three times, a clinical return driven by the second and third strikes rather than the first.

FULL TIMEBundesliga

Marco Grüll vs Ridle Baku

Full-time 3–1

Marco GrüllRidle Baku
50Touches137
2Chances created1
5Shots3
0.15xG0.45
9.17Rating7.64

Biggest gap: xG 0.15–0.45.

READ THE FULL ANALYSIS
measuredtake.com
Marco Grüll 3–1 Ridle Baku. Touches 50 to 137. Chances created 2 to 1. Shots 5 to 3. xG 0.15 to 0.45. Rating 9.17 to 7.64.

Grüll finished with a goal, 0.15 xG on his own account, and two shots on target. Baku's consolation brought his xG to 0.45, the highest individual total of the day, but arrived when the contest was already settled. Füllkrug's first Werder Bremen goal since returning to the club gave the home supporters the moment the afternoon had been building toward. Chuki, who assisted Dinkçi after four minutes, left to applause rather than relief at 83 minutes.

Leipzig's structure, a 4-3-3 that produced 612 accurate passes at 89% completion, kept the ball moving but did not move the scoreboard. Bremen's 4-2-3-1, with 208 accurate passes at 72%, did less with possession and more with territory. The visitors won the second-half duel count 31-31 after losing it 26-14 in the first half. They had the territory and the duels after the break. They did not have the goals.

Daniel Thioune's side bounced back from their opening-weekend defeat at Freiburg with a result that will not flatter them on the underlying numbers and will not bother them either. Three points is three points. Leipzig leave the Weserstadion with the larger share of the chance volume and the smaller share of the result.

Sources

FotMob.

TweetLinkedIn

More in this thread

Reader notes

Loading comments...