UK Court Convicts Four Palestine Action Activists in Elbit Systems Raid
Four activists convicted of criminal damage for a 2024 raid on Elbit Systems’ Bristol factory that caused roughly £1 million in damage; defence claims the action saved lives in Palestine.

A person wearing a red jumpsuit and black cap, using a sledgehammer to damage equipment inside the factory.
TL;DR
Four of six Palestine Action activists were convicted of criminal damage for a 2024 raid on Elbit Systems’ Bristol factory, which prosecutors said caused about £1 million ($1.36 million) in damage. The defence argued the activists had already avoided the most serious charges and believed destroying Israeli drones likely saved lives in Palestine.
Context In August 2024, members of the now‑banned Palestine Action group broke into Elbit Systems’ research and development site in Filton, Bristol. The raid occurred roughly ten months after the start of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza. The group was later proscribed under UK terrorism law, a designation that was temporarily overturned by the High Court but remains in place pending government appeal.
Key Facts Woolwich Crown Court found Charlotte Head, Samuel Corner, Leona Kamio, and Fatema Zainab Rajwani guilty of criminal damage. Corner was also convicted of inflicting grievous bodily harm for allegedly striking a police officer with a sledgehammer. Zoe Rogers and Jordan Devlin were acquitted. Prosecutors estimated the damage at about one million pounds, equivalent to $1.36 million. The defence team stated the defendants had already defeated the most serious charges and maintained that their destruction of Israeli military drones likely saved lives in Palestine.
What It Means The verdict reinforces the UK’s willingness to prosecute property damage linked to pro‑Palestinian activism, even when activists claim humanitarian motives. It may deter similar direct‑action tactics against defence contractors, though the debate over the legitimacy of such protests continues. Watch for the government’s appeal of the terrorism‑law proscription of Palestine Action and any potential civil suits arising from the raid.
Continue reading
More in this thread
Conversation
Reader notes
Loading comments...