Business4 hrs ago

Santa Clara County Sues Meta Over $7 Billion Scam‑Ad Revenue

Santa Clara County alleges Meta earns $7 billion annually from scam ads and sues the company as Californians lose $2.5 billion to fraud.

Elena Voss/3 min/US

Business & Markets Editor

TweetLinkedIn

No source-linked image is attached to this story yet. Measured Take avoids generic stock art when a relevant credited image is not available.

Santa Clara County claims Meta makes about $7 billion each year from scam advertisements and is suing the company for endangering vulnerable users.

Context Meta Platforms, the owner of Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Messenger and Threads, faces a new lawsuit from Santa Clara County, California. The county, home to Silicon Valley’s tech hub, filed the suit on behalf of all state residents, accusing Meta of knowingly profiting from deceptive ads that target vulnerable consumers.

Key Facts - The complaint alleges Meta “facilitates and monetises” scam ads, generating roughly $7 billion in annual revenue from them. - California residents reported more than $2.5 billion in losses to scams in 2024, with seniors bearing a disproportionate share. - County counsel Tony LoPresti warned that billions of scam ads run daily on Meta’s platforms put real people at risk, especially the vulnerable. - Internal documents cited by Reuters indicate Meta only bans advertisers it is 95 % certain are fraudulent; lower‑certainty accounts are charged higher fees to stay online. - The alleged scams include fake financial products, cryptocurrency schemes, bogus cures, ineffective supplements and celebrity impersonations asking for money. - Meta says it removed 159 million scam ads last year and works with law enforcement, calling the lawsuit a distortion of its motives. - The suit adds to a string of recent legal challenges, including a March California jury verdict that held Meta liable for addictive design features and a Consumer Federation of America lawsuit alleging consumer‑protection violations.

What It Means If the county proves Meta’s ad‑ranking system deliberately lets low‑certainty scammers run for profit, the company could face significant financial penalties and be forced to overhaul its ad‑moderation algorithms. A ruling against Meta would also set a precedent for holding tech firms accountable for revenue derived from harmful content. The outcome may influence how other platforms police deceptive advertising and could spur additional state‑level actions.

Looking ahead, watch for the court’s response to the county’s claims and any regulatory changes Meta may adopt to curb scam ads before the case proceeds to trial.

TweetLinkedIn

More in this thread

Reader notes

Loading comments...