Politics1 hr ago

Judge Orders US to Return Colombian Woman Deported to Congo Amid Health Crisis

A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to bring back a Colombian woman deported to the Democratic Republic of Congo after her health deteriorated, highlighting limits on third‑country removals.

Nadia Okafor/3 min/GB

Political Correspondent

TweetLinkedIn
Judge Orders US to Return Colombian Woman Deported to Congo Amid Health Crisis
Source: The GuardianOriginal source

A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to bring a Colombian woman back from the Democratic Republic of Congo after her health deteriorated in detention, citing concerns over untreated diabetes and thyroid disease. The ruling comes amid a broader strategy that has produced over 15,000 third‑country deportation orders, few of which have been enacted, raising questions about the program’s effectiveness.

Context She entered the US from Mexico in August 2024, was taken into ICE custody, and later sent to Kinshasa even though the Democratic Republic of Congo had declined to accept her, while her asylum claim remained pending. Quiroz Zapata, 55, lives with diabetes and a thyroid condition; while detained she developed black spots on her skin, peeling, and darkened nails, and reported worsening fatigue. Her lawyer says she is not doing well and fears she may die, noting the hotel where she stays is locked, supervision limits her movement, and that she receives only intermittent medical check‑ups.

Key Facts Judge Richard Leon ruled the deportation likely illegal because the woman was sent to a country that refused to accept her and cannot provide sufficient medical care, and highlighted the risk of fatal complications. He ordered the Trump administration to return her to the United States immediately to address her worsening condition. Advocacy groups say more than 15,000 third‑country deportation orders have been issued under the administration's expansion push, but only a small fraction have been carried out, with estimates suggesting fewer than 300 actual removals.

What It Means The decision underscores that the government cannot lawfully deport individuals to nations unable to meet their basic health needs, potentially affecting thousands of comparable cases, and may prompt a review of existing removal agreements. It also reflects judicial resistance to the administration's broad use of bilateral agreements with countries like Ecuador, Honduras, Uganda, Cameroon and the Democratic Republic of Congo, which have been criticized for lacking transparent oversight. Experts warn the ruling may spur additional lawsuits and could shape how future asylum seekers are processed when third‑country removals are considered, and could influence forthcoming immigration reform debates.

Watch for the administration's response to the court order and any additional lawsuits challenging third‑country deportations, as well as any potential appeals that could delay implementation.

TweetLinkedIn

More in this thread

Reader notes

Loading comments...