FBI Director Kash Patel Sues Atlantic for $250 Million Over Alleged Drinking and Absences
FBI Director Kash Patel is suing The Atlantic for $250 million, citing libel, slander, and assault following an article alleging excessive drinking and work absences.
FBI Director Kash Patel initiated a $250 million lawsuit against The Atlantic magazine, alleging libel, slander, and assault. The lawsuit stems from an article that claims Patel exhibits excessive drinking and frequent work absences.
FBI Director Kash Patel filed a lawsuit against The Atlantic magazine in Washington DC district court. This action follows the publication of an article detailing allegations against Patel. The legal complaint names both the magazine and its author, Sarah Fitzpatrick.
The Atlantic article, published last week, alleges that Patel drinks excessively and is often unreachable during work hours. These claims rely on unnamed officials identified as current and former sources within the piece. Patel's lawsuit seeks $250 million in damages, citing libel, assault, and slander. Libel refers to written defamation, while slander describes spoken defamation.
Prior to the story's release, Patel warned The Atlantic about potential legal action. He conveyed, "Print it, all false, I’ll see you in court – bring your checkbook," indicating his readiness to challenge the publication. Patel's legal team has characterized the article as a "sweeping, malicious, and defamatory hit piece."
They contend it was designed to damage his reputation and force his departure from office. The complaint further argues the author failed to secure on-the-record sources to support "outrageous allegations," instead relying on anonymous individuals described as partisan with ulterior motives. This approach, Patel's lawyers suggest, demonstrates "actual malice" on the part of the magazine and reporter Sarah Fitzpatrick, a critical standard for winning defamation lawsuits filed by public figures.
This lawsuit will test the legal boundaries of journalistic reporting based on anonymous sources. The proceedings will likely focus on whether The Atlantic acted with actual malice, a high bar for public figures to prove in defamation claims. All parties now await court proceedings to determine the outcome of this significant legal challenge.
Continue reading
More in this thread
Conversation
Reader notes
Loading comments...